When Negative News Travels Faster Than the Show Itself
Negative stories travel fast.
Far faster than applause, word-of-mouth recommendations, or the quiet satisfaction of an audience leaving a theatre happy.
That’s certainly been the case this week, following reports surrounding a performance of Wicked Wizard of Oz: A Cirque Spectacular Christmas Show at the Brighton Centre, where several audience members were reported not to be not happy. Some were reported to have walked out during the interval. Others left before the show had finished. Refunds were mentioned. Frustration was clear.
It makes for uncomfortable reading.
However the Argus reported that on the 2nd night of the performance, things had improved- Wicked Wizard of Oz at Brighton Centre shows improvement | The Argus
But it also raises a bigger question: what actually happened in that auditorium — and how should audiences interpret reports like these?
A Show Under Pressure
From audience accounts, the issues appear less about the concept itself and more about execution on the night. Technical problems were cited.
For a show billed as “Panto meets Cirque”, expectations were understandably high — and for some, the delivery didn’t match what was promised.
If those technical faults were significant, it leads to an awkward but important dilemma for producers and venues alike:
Do you cancel the show, or try to stage it anyway?
Cancelling avoids presenting something that isn’t ready — but risks disappointing (and angering) thousands of ticket-holders who have travelled, booked childcare, or made a special Christmas outing of it. Going ahead keeps the doors open, but leaves you vulnerable if the show cannot be delivered as intended.
There’s no easy call.
A Costly Decision
With hindsight, it seems the wrong decision was potentially made on the first night.
If it was clear that the technical issues meant the show could not be delivered as billed, cancelling — however painful — may have been the lesser of two evils.
Instead, the production went ahead and paid a heavier price:
negative publicity that travelled faster than any later improvements, and criticism that now risks defining the tour far more than the show itself deserve which is potentially unfair. The cast have trained and rehearsed so hard.
In theatre, audiences are often forgiving when things go wrong — if they’re honest and upfront about it.
Why Reviews Matter
This is precisely why independent reviewers exist.
Reviewers aren’t there to pile on when things go wrong, nor to blindly cheer when things go right. Our role sits between theatres and audiences — offering context, balance, and informed judgement.
We try to see shows early in their run.
We aim to assess what’s on stage as it is, not as it was promised.
And crucially, we help audiences decide whether to go now, later, or not at all.
A first night riddled with technical problems can look very different a week later once fixes are made. Equally, sometimes issues are deeper than teething troubles. That distinction matters — and it’s rarely captured in viral headlines or angry comment threads.
What Should Audiences Do Now?
If you’re considering this production at one of its upcoming venues, the sensible advice is simple:
Pause, watch, and read.
See how the show settles at its next stop. Look for multiple reviews — not just the loudest reactions. A production that promises spectacle may still yet deliver, also look at previous reviews of the show
For now, it’s fair to say that some audiences in Brighton felt let down — and that matters. But it’s also worth remembering that a single troubled performance doesn’t always define a tour.
In theatre, as in life, context is everything.
And sometimes, the most responsible judgement is not rushing to a verdict — but waiting to see the full picture.
Oh and course if the show producers want Theatre Village to pop along to review it fairly, just give us a bell. Grace is awaiting.
About the Author
